2nd (4/19~4/23)

In this week, we continued reading Meiland(1-4~1-10) and deepened our comprehension of contents.
Also, we learned about ARP with using two ARPs of Meiland. We compared them and analysed what the ARP is. The point is that a summary will depend on its discussion. The statements that are criticized in discussion have to be focused in summary, too.
While discussing the worksheet, I understood the meaning of normative statement and descriptive statement. Normative statement has to be kind of ideal and descriptive statement has to be a matter of fact. Actually, Hayato's example made me understood. Then, I found the ARPs we used in class could be an example of them. Bayne is giving a normative statement at the end of his discussion, while Hammond writes descriptive statement.