What is the most reasonable theory?
I think I always make decision by thinking profit and loss. Therefore my way of thinking is I consequentalism. For me, it is very hard to imagine the situation of intuitionism. It is one of my worries recently...:( May be I just don't confront the situation to make decision immediately.
However, considering the ethical problem, consequentalims has a big shortcoming that it ignores the minority people who will get disadvantage. Even if many people gain advantages, I think it is not right, (←Is this sense of "right" is intuitionism?! I hope so.) Imagine if you were one of the minority of people who would get disadvantage because of particular solution which comes from consequentalism. I think you can't be persuaded by the reason that majority of people are happy.
However, it is true that it has practical effect. It can't be applied to the situation proposed in the lecture of justice (kill 1 person or 5 people..), but may be another measure can' be taken to support minority. But I can't give specific example of bioethics...
And I like right ethics, because my life is the posession of myself and it exists for myself. So it is natural action to respect individual rights.
However, human can exist, because community of human exists and we are supporting each other. Therefore, may be it is duty to think about society or other people. We can't just respect own rights.
In conclusion, I think it is good to utilize both rights ethics and consequentalism.
I started cofusing... My opinion is badly organized...:(
And I always forget that these are talking about ethics.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿